That is a good point, and I had wondered if it would become too much like the discussion page as well. I'm not sure if we can create rules (or just general guidelines), for people to post (i.e., the first person to start a thread must post a general introduction of what their code does, why it's useful, what other code must be implemented to their project to make this code work, and then they must post valid, working code below that. Additional replies on the page may be amendments or changes to the code that improved the speed or performance of the original code posted.
There obviously would have to be more organization to this section also. For instance, where should the code posted be placed: is it a tool, an addition or change to the previous dotspatial code (i.e., dotspatial.symbology.forms), or even categorized as general or miscellaneous? What I don't want to see in this section are posts asking people for help with a tool they want, or help with code they are working on, or ideas for additional dotspatial work, etc. Those topics should be left to the Discussions section.
Maybe if someone starts thread that does not follow the rules of the section and it gets moved by the editor to the Discussion section, that person gets a slap on the hand or check mark on their account. Thoughts?
There obviously would have to be more organization to this section also. For instance, where should the code posted be placed: is it a tool, an addition or change to the previous dotspatial code (i.e., dotspatial.symbology.forms), or even categorized as general or miscellaneous? What I don't want to see in this section are posts asking people for help with a tool they want, or help with code they are working on, or ideas for additional dotspatial work, etc. Those topics should be left to the Discussions section.
Maybe if someone starts thread that does not follow the rules of the section and it gets moved by the editor to the Discussion section, that person gets a slap on the hand or check mark on their account. Thoughts?
